Section Ⅱ Reading Comprehension

Part A

　　Text 1

　　France, which prides itself as the global innovator of fashion, has decided its fashion industry has lost an absolute right to define physical beauty for women. Its lawmakers gave preliminary approval last week to a law that would make it a crime to employ ultra-thin models on runways.

　　The parliament also agreed to ban websites that “incite excessive thinness” by promoting extreme dieting.

　　Such measures have a couple of uplifting motives. They suggest beauty should not be defined by looks that end up impinging on health. That’s a start. And the ban on ultra-thin models seems to go beyond protecting models from starving themselves to death - as some have done. It tells the fashion industry that it must take responsibility for the signal it sends women, especially teenage girls, about the social tape-measure they must use to determine their individual worth.

　　The bans, if fully enforced, would suggest to women (and many men) that they should not let others be arbiters of their beauty. And perhaps faintly, they hint that people should look to intangible qualities like character and intellect rather than dieting their way to size zero or wasp-waist physiques.

　　The French measures, however, rely too much on severe punishment to change a culture that still regards beauty as skin-deep — and bone-showing. Under the law, using a fashion model that does not meet a government-defined index of body mass could result in a $85,000 fine and six months in prison.

　　The fashion industry knows it has an inherent problem in focusing on material adornment and idealized body types. In Denmark, the United States, and a few other countries, it is trying to set voluntary standards for models and fashion images that rely more on peer pressure for enforcement.

　　In contrast to France’s actions, Denmark’s fashion industry agreed last month on rules and sanctions regarding the age, health, and other characteristics of models. The newly revised Danish Fashion Ethical Charter clearly states: “We are aware of and take responsibility for the impact the fashion industry has on body ideals, especially on young people.’ The charter’s main tool of enforcement is to deny access for designers and modeling agencies to Copenhagen Fashion Week, which is run by the Danish Fashion Institute. But in general it relies on a name-and-shame method of compliance.

　　Relying on ethical persuasion rather than law to address the misuse of body ideals may be the best step. Even better would be to help elevate notions of beauty beyond the material standards of a particular industry.

　　21. According to the first paragraph, what would happen in France?

　　[A] Physical beauty would be redefined.

　　[B] New runways would be constructed.

　　[C] Websites about dieting would thrive.

　　[D] The fashion industry would decline.

　　【答案】 [A] Physical beauty would be redefined

　　【解析】 推斷題。根據(jù)France定位到文章前兩段，第一段講法國(guó)決定時(shí)裝業(yè)失去了定義（define）形體美（physical beauty）的絕對(duì)權(quán)力。法國(guó)的立法者通過(guò)了一項(xiàng)法律，雇用超瘦的模特屬于犯罪，議會(huì)也禁止網(wǎng)站通過(guò)推崇極端節(jié)食“鼓動(dòng)過(guò)度瘦弱”。第二段第二句提到“They suggest beauty should not be defined by looks that end up impinging on health. That’s a start. 他們建議美麗不應(yīng)該以傷害身體健康為代價(jià)的外表來(lái)界定。”由此可知，法國(guó)通過(guò)立法手段來(lái)改變法國(guó)時(shí)裝業(yè)模特超瘦的現(xiàn)狀，即[A]項(xiàng)的“形體美將會(huì)被重新定義”，是對(duì)原文內(nèi)容的合理推斷。[B]項(xiàng)“將會(huì)建造新的舞臺(tái)”，[C]項(xiàng)“有關(guān)節(jié)食的網(wǎng)站將會(huì)興起”，[D]項(xiàng)“時(shí)裝業(yè)將會(huì)衰退”，均不能從文中推測(cè)出來(lái)，屬于“無(wú)中生有”。

　　22. The phrase “impinging on” (Line 2, Para 2) is closest in meaning to____

　　[A] heightening the value of.

　　[B] indicating the state of.

　　[C] losing faith in.

　　[D] doing harm to.

　　【答案】 [D] doing harm to

　　【解析】猜詞題。定位到第二段第二句“They suggest beauty should not be defined by looks that end up impinging on health. 他們建議美麗不應(yīng)該以 身體健康為代價(jià)的外表來(lái)界定。”impinging on后面的賓語(yǔ)為“health”，即對(duì)健康的某種影響。根據(jù)第二段第三句“對(duì)超瘦模特的禁令似乎不僅僅是在防止模特挨餓致死——正如曾有人這么做過(guò)的”，可見(jiàn)法國(guó)目前的對(duì)美麗的定義導(dǎo)致了有人為了保持身材，挨餓致死，因此推測(cè)出這一短語(yǔ)在這里的意思為“侵犯，傷害”，[D]項(xiàng)“對(duì)……有害”正確。[A]項(xiàng)“增強(qiáng)了……的價(jià)值”，[B]項(xiàng)“反映了……的狀態(tài)”，[C]項(xiàng)“對(duì)……失去信心”均不符合句意。

　　23. Which of the following is true of the fashion industry?

　　[A] The French measures have already failed.

　　[B] New standards are being set in Denmark.

　　[C] Model are no longer under peer pressure.

　　[D] Its inherent problems are getting worse.

　　【答案】 [B] New Standards are being set in Denmark

　　【解析】細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)第五段第二句話“In Denmark,...it is trying to set voluntary standards for models and fashion... 在丹麥，它正嘗試為模特設(shè)定自愿的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)……”，可知[B]項(xiàng)“在丹麥新的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)正在被設(shè)定”是對(duì)原文的同義替換。[A]項(xiàng)“法國(guó)的措施失敗了”；[C]項(xiàng)“不再有來(lái)自同行執(zhí)法的壓力”，文章第五段第二句后半句提到“images that rely more on peer pressure for enforcement”，屬于“正反混淆”；[D]項(xiàng)“它固有的問(wèn)題變得更嚴(yán)重了”，文中第五段只提及時(shí)裝業(yè)有固有的問(wèn)題，并未提及“變得更嚴(yán)重”，屬于“無(wú)中生有”。

　　24. A designer is most likely to be rejected by CFW for ____

　　[A] setting a high age threshold for models.

　　[B] caring too much about models’ character.

　　[C] showing little concern for health factors.

　　[D] pursuing perfect physical conditions.

　　【答案】 [C] showing little concern for health factors

　　【解析】推斷題。題設(shè)為“一個(gè)設(shè)計(jì)師很可能因?yàn)槭裁丛虮籆FW拒絕”，根據(jù)關(guān)鍵詞CFW可回到文中定位至倒數(shù)第二段，該段提到丹麥的時(shí)尚界就有關(guān)模特的年齡、健康及其他特性的內(nèi)容達(dá)成一致意見(jiàn)，且一項(xiàng)新法案也明確規(guī)定，他們已經(jīng)意識(shí)到時(shí)尚界對(duì)于人們尤其是年輕人的身體健康所帶來(lái)的影響，并且應(yīng)該對(duì)此承擔(dān)責(zé)任，這一法規(guī)的執(zhí)行方式就是拒絕一些設(shè)計(jì)師和模特經(jīng)紀(jì)機(jī)構(gòu)參加哥本哈根時(shí)裝周（CFW）。因此[C]項(xiàng)的“不關(guān)心健康因素”符合題意，為正確答案。[D]項(xiàng)“追求完美的身體狀況”，[B]項(xiàng)的“過(guò)多關(guān)注模特的性格”，[A]項(xiàng)“設(shè)定了一個(gè)模特高齡門檻”，均不符合題意。

　　25. Which of the following may be the best title of the text?

　　[A] The Great Threats to the Fashion Industry

　　[B] Just Another Round of Struggle for Beauty

　　[C] A Dilemma for the Starving Models in France

　　[D] A Challenge to the Fashion Industry’s Body Ideals

　　【答案】 [D] A challenge to the Fashion Industry’s Body Ideals

　　【解析】主旨題。本文從首段就開(kāi)始闡述法國(guó)通過(guò)立法禁止雇用超瘦的模特，時(shí)裝業(yè)已經(jīng)失去了定義女性身體之美的絕對(duì)權(quán)力，且議會(huì)也禁止網(wǎng)站通過(guò)宣傳過(guò)度節(jié)食來(lái)強(qiáng)調(diào)過(guò)度消瘦。第二段繼續(xù)說(shuō)明美麗不能只看外表，更不能以犧牲健康為代價(jià)，時(shí)裝業(yè)應(yīng)該為傳遞給女性的不良信息負(fù)責(zé)。第三段說(shuō)明女性不該讓他人來(lái)評(píng)判自己的美麗。第四段講法國(guó)的措施更多的是依靠嚴(yán)厲的懲罰。最后三段提到了丹麥與法國(guó)截然不同的措施?？v觀全文，文章主要在講各個(gè)國(guó)家對(duì)解決目前模特超瘦的現(xiàn)狀的措施，因此[D]項(xiàng)的“對(duì)時(shí)裝業(yè)身體典范的挑戰(zhàn)”是對(duì)原文的“高度概括”。